Structured Finance Association Logo

Menu
  • SFA on the Issues
    • Back
    • Overview
    • Committees and Task Forces
    • COVID-19: Supporting Consumers & Businesses
    • Capital & Other Bank Regulations
    • Disclosure & Reporting
    • ESG Disclosure Initiative
    • Global Initiatives
    • Housing Finance
    • LIBOR Transition
    • Market Structure & Dynamics
    • Research Corner
    • Structured Finance in the Courts
  • About Securitization
  • News
    • Back
    • Overview
    • Press Releases
    • Industry News
    • SFA News
    • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Events
  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Hub
  • Women in Securitization
  • Structured Finance Coalition
  • Structured Finance Foundation
  • About Us
    • Back
    • Overview
    • Board of Directors
    • Our Team
    • Our Members
    • Committees and Task Forces
  • Join Membership
    • About Membership
    • Join
  • Blog
  • Multimedia Library
  • Structured Thinking by Michael Bright
  • Make a Payment
  • Careers

    SFA Responds to FIMSAC Recommendations to Mitigate Conflicts of Interest in Credit Ratings

    Download Full Response Letter

    In December 2020, the Structured Finance Association (SFA) submitted feedback to the Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee (FIMSAC), an advisory group to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), regarding the oversight and regulation of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs).

     

    Background

    The Credit Ratings Subcommittee of the FIMSAC was formed to consider the role of NRSRO credit ratings in various financial markets. One of the key focuses for this subcommittee is the exploration of potential conflicts of interest in industry payment models. After soliciting feedback from industry participants on this topic, the FIMSAC subcommittee set forth recommendations (FIMSAC Recommendations) aimed at improving both transparency and potential outcomes for investors. These recommendations included:

     

    • Increased NRSRO disclosure
    • Enhanced disclosures by issuers of unsecured corporate debt or securitized debt, and
    • A mechanism for bondholders to vote to ratify the issuer-selected NRSROs

     

    SFA Response: Key Points

     

    SFA’s response to FIMSAC highlighted that, it is important to ensure proper regulatory requirements and market practices to address the “potential conflicts of interest associated with the current issuer-pay model” (as described in the FIMSAC Recommendations), and thus to instill and maintain confidence in the investor community that the NRSROs will issue ratings independent and free from influence resulting from conflicts of interest.  Moreover, with the right balance of information disclosure, supervisory oversight and market discipline, concerns related to potential conflicts of interest in the credit rating process can continue to be carefully monitored and managed in a manner that protects and enhances the critical role that NRSROs play in the health and stability of our financial system and within the securitization market.

     

    SFA agreed with FIMSAC that high-quality information is a requisite for financial markets if they are to efficiently allocate capital and create liquidity, and thus allow the country’s households and businesses to grow and to invest responsibly.

     

    Given the vital role that credit ratings play, SFA also agreed that it is important for the SEC to periodically review its regulation of the credit rating process while keeping in mind the comprehensive changes to the oversight of NRSROs, including new disclosure requirements, that have been adopted since the financial crisis of 2008.  The checks and balances already in place should continue to be evaluated to ensure that they are sufficient and effective, and that their benefits continue to outweigh related costs. It is particularly important to recognize that the securitization market has evolved in response to this system of checks and balances, and that new regulatory initiatives should be prudently designed to provide adaptable oversight.

     

    Specific to the FIMSAC recommendations, SFA expressed:

     

    • Willingness to consider providing enhanced issuer disclosure regarding their process of selecting an organization to rate a bond while importantly noting there was little guidance in the FIMSAC Recommendations regarding how issuer policies and practices might be further developed.
      • SFA issuer members expressed willingness to examine disclosure policies that would generally accord with the idea that public NRSRO ratings of bonds should be disclosed. Such disclosures should, however, extend only to the ratings of those NRSROs that an issuer hires; disclosures should not extend to private ratings or to tranches that issuers do not ask NRSROs to rate.

     

    • SFA also recommends that any additional disclosure be made in “free-writing prospectuses” (as defined pursuant to SEC rules), and not be incorporated in registration statements themselves.

     

    • Support of initiatives to enhance transparency with regard to the methodologies and models employed by NRSROs. However, SFA expressed concern that the specific suggestions described in the FIMSAC Recommendations seem to reflect a misunderstanding of the ratings process for securitization transactions.
      • Accordingly, the specific recommendation regarding NRSRO disclosure was difficult to address in detail. Nonetheless, our NRSRO members expressed that they are committed to providing investors and other market participants useful information to help them make informed decisions.  Accordingly, SFA and its members remain available for discussions with FIMSAC and the SEC as they consider whether further NRSRO disclosure would benefit the market.

     

    • Concern that a bondholder ratification process, as suggested by the FIMSAC Recommendations, would be unworkable for securitization transactions and could result in consequences that, though unintended, are foreseeable and adverse.

    Click here to read the full response.

    Related

    Senate Banking Committee Reflects on Clayton’s Tenure at SEC

    The SEC Advisory Committee, FIMSAC, Meeting Agenda to Include Recommendation Concerning Issuer-Pay Conflict of Interest in Credit Ratings

    SFA Releases Overview of FIMSAC Meeting on Rating Agency Compensation Models

    Securitization Alliance logo
    • Resources
    • Membership
    • Make a Payment
    • Join
    • Newsletter Sign Up
    • About Securitization
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • SFA on the Issues
    • About Securitization
    • News
    • Events
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Hub
    • Women in Securitization
    • Structured Finance Coalition
    • Structured Finance Foundation
    • About Us

    Structured Finance Association

    1776 I Street NW Suite 501

    Washington, DC 20006

    Privacy Policy Terms of Use
    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT